Abstract
With the aim of determining the optimal duration of visual male exposure on the reproductive performance of nulliparous guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus), this study evaluated key reproductive indicators from mating to parturition. Sixty 60-day-old females were distributed into three treatments: traditional continuous mating (T0), controlled mating with 14-day prior visual male exposure (T1), and controlled mating with 7-day prior visual male exposure (T2). Results showed that T1 significantly increased the frequency of first estrus between days 6 and 10 (67%; p = .02) compared to T0 and T2 (38%). Additionally, T1 showed the highest frequency of afternoon estrus (42%; p < .05) and a higher rate of estrus repetition (p < .05). Regarding reproductive efficiency, T0 and T2 females exhibited significantly fewer non-productive days (10.5 and 11.3 d, respectively) compared to T1 (17.0 d; p < .01). Conversely, the feed cost per female was lowest in T1 (7.23 PEN), followed by T2 (9.27 PEN) and T0 (10.05 PEN; p < .01). No significant differences were observed in litter size (p = .08) or litter weight (p = .23). In conclusion, while 14 days of visual biostimulation prior to mating optimizes estrus synchronization but increases reproductive failures, a 7-day exposure successfully reduces non-productive days and feed expenditure in nulliparous guinea pigs, improving the economic merit of the intensive system without compromising productive parameters.
References
Araníbar, E., & Echevarría, L. (2014). Número de ovulaciones por ciclo estrual en cuyes (Cavia porcellus) Andina y Perú. Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú, 25(1), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v25i1.8465.
Chasles, M., Chesneau, D., Moussu, C., Poissenot, K., Beltramo, M., Delgadillo, J. A., Chemineau, P., & Keller, M. (2018). Sexually active bucks are a critical social cue that activates the gonadotrope axis and early puberty onset in does. Hormones and Behavior, 106, 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.10.004. PMid:30308180.
Espinoza-Flores, L. A., Andrade-Esparza, J. D., Hernandez, H., Zarazaga, L. A., Abecia, J. A., Chemineau, P., Keller, M.,& Delgadillo, J. A. (2020). Male effect using photostimulated bucks and nutritional supplementation advance puberty in goats under semi-extensive management. Theriogenology, 143, 82-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. theriogenology.2019.12.005. PMid:31862671.
Flanagan, K. A., Webb, W., & Stowers, L. (2011). Analysis of male pheromones that accelerate female reproductive organ development. PLoS One, 6(2), e16660. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016660. PMid:21347429.
Gelez, H., & Fabre-Nys, C. (2004). The “male effect” in sheep and goats: a review of the respective roles of the two olfactory systems. Hormones and Behavior, 46(3), 257-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.05.002. PMid:15325227.
Grégoire, A., Allard, A., Huamán, E., León, S., Silva, R. M., Buff, S., Berard, M., & Joly, T. (2012). Control of the estrous cycle in guinea-pig (Cavia porcellus). Theriogenology, 78(4), 842-847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. theriogenology.2012.03.034. PMid:22626773.
Hargaden, M., & Singer, L. (2012). Anatomy, physiology, and behavior. In M. A. Suckow, K. A. Stevens & R. P. Wilson (Eds.), The Laboratory Rabbit, Guinea Pig, Hamster, and Other Rodents (pp. 575-602). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-380920-9.00020-1
Harkness, J. E., Murray, K. A., & Wagner, J. E. (2002). Biology and diseases of guinea pigs. In J. G. Fox, L. C. Anderson, F. M. Loew & F. W. Quimbly (Eds.), Laboratory Animal Medicine (pp. 203-246). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012263951-7/50009-0
Labajova, K., Hansson, H., Asmild, M., Göransson, L., Lagerkvist, C. J., & Neil, M. (2016). Multidirectional analysis of technical efficiency for pig production systems: The case of Sweden. Livestock Science, 187, 168-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.03.009.
Landaeta-Hernández, A. J., Ungerfeld, R., & Chenoweth, P. J. (2023). Biostimulation and pheromones in livestock: A review. Animal Reproduction Science, 248, 107154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2022.107154. PMid:36495839.
Lucy, M. C. (2019). Symposium review: Selection for fertility in the modern dairy cow—Current status and future directions for genetic selection. Journal of Dairy Science, 102(4), 3706-3721. https://doi.org/10.3168/ jds.2018-15544. PMid:30692008.
Matos, A. S., Kugelmeier, T., Guimarães, D. A. A., & Silva, K. S. M. (2022). Early puberty in short-haired Guinea pigs kept in laboratory animal facilities. Animal Reproduction, 19(1), e20210068. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984- 3143-ar2021-0068. PMid:35493786.
McGlone, J. J., Duke, L., Sanchez, M., & Garcia, A. (2023). Self-administration of a boar priming pheromone stimulates puberty in gilts without boar exposure. Animals (Basel), 14(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14010091. PMid:38200826.
Olateju, I. S., & Chineke, C. A. (2022). Effects of genotype, gestation length and litter size on the birth weight, litter weight, pre-and post-weaning weight of crossbred kits. Bulletin of the National Research Center, 46(1), 166. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-022-00843-8.
Perry, G. A. (2016). Factors affecting puberty in replacement beef heifers. Theriogenology, 86(1), 373-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.04.051. PMid:27160450.
Pierozan, C. R., Callegari, M. A., Dias, C. P., de Souza, K. L., Gasa, J., & da Silva, C. A. (2021). Herd-level factors associated with non-productive days and farrowing rate in commercial pig farms in two consecutive years. Livestock Science, 244, 104312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104312.
R Core Team. (2025). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Rostellato, R., Bonfatti, V., Dias, V. A. D., Savoia, S., Spalenza, V., Albera, A., & Carnier, P. (2021). Estimates of non-genetic effects and genetic parameters for semen traits in Piemontese bulls. Animal, 15(8), 100302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100302. PMid:34245953.
Shomer, N. H., Holcombe, H., & Harkness, J. E. (2015). Biology and diseases of guinea pigs. In J. G. Fox, L. C. Anderson, F. M. Loew & F. W. Quimbly (Eds.), Laboratory Animal Medicine (pp. 247-283). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409527-4.00006-7
Steele, N. M., Stephen, M. A., Kuhn-Sherlock, B., Hendriks, S. J., Meier, S., Phyn, C., & Burke, C. R. (2023). Animal-and herd-level factors associated with onset of puberty in grazing dairy heifers. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 71(5), 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2023.2224763. PMid:37431287.
Trillmich, F., Laurien-Kehnen, C., Adrian, A., & Linke, S. (2006). Age at maturity in cavies and guinea-pigs (Cavia aperea and Cavia aperea f. porcellus): Influence of social factors. Journal of Zoology (London, England), 268(3), 285-294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2005.00015.x.
Tzanidakis, C., Simitzis, P., Arvanitis, K., & Panagakis, P. (2021). An overview of the current trends in precision pig farming technologies. Livestock Science, 249, 104530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104530.
Young, W. C. (1969). Psychobiology of sexual behavior in the guinea pig. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 2, 1-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60068-6.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Hilario Noberto Pujada Abad, Edinson Collas Ostos, Roberto Carlos Tamayo Diaz, Rufino Máximo Maguiña Maza, Víctor Joselito Linares Cabrera, Julio César Valencia Bardales, Miguel Edmundo Lucho-Cerga, Javier Hernán Luyo Flores, Felix Esteban Airahuacho-Bautista

